<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing new Adobe.com PDF embed feature</title>
	<link>http://jiveguru.com/2008/06/02/testing-new-adobecom-pdf-embed-feature-2/</link>
	<description>Attempting to say something that hasn't already been said</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shebanow</title>
		<link>http://jiveguru.com/2008/06/02/testing-new-adobecom-pdf-embed-feature-2/#comment-320</link>
		<author>Andrew Shebanow</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jiveguru.com/2008/06/02/testing-new-adobecom-pdf-embed-feature-2/#comment-320</guid>
					<description>I'm from Adobe's Acrobat.com team, so I shouldn't vote, but fwiw I think ours has the prettiest UI but docstoc's is the most useful. Scribd's annoys me because it doesn't have a full screen mode - it redirects you to their site instead.

At any rate, although this comparison is useful if you are looking to put document previews on your blog/site, it really only covers half the story - we don't really compete with either docstoc or scribd. Both of the latter are really intended to be 'youtube for documents' with a central portal where people can go to find and read things. We're much more focused on being a location for people to do work on documents collaboratively. Our embedded viewer's features were chosen with this goal in mind, which is why we considered features like search, etc lower priority - the important thing for us was to help you find the actual document you were looking for and then do work on the *original* document, not to be a reading environment for other people's content.

This difference will become much clearer over time as we integrate buzzword documents and the like directly into our interface, so that we can have integrated view/edit/comment workflows directly within a single acrobat.com interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from Adobe&#8217;s Acrobat.com team, so I shouldn&#8217;t vote, but fwiw I think ours has the prettiest UI but docstoc&#8217;s is the most useful. Scribd&#8217;s annoys me because it doesn&#8217;t have a full screen mode - it redirects you to their site instead.</p>
<p>At any rate, although this comparison is useful if you are looking to put document previews on your blog/site, it really only covers half the story - we don&#8217;t really compete with either docstoc or scribd. Both of the latter are really intended to be &#8216;youtube for documents&#8217; with a central portal where people can go to find and read things. We&#8217;re much more focused on being a location for people to do work on documents collaboratively. Our embedded viewer&#8217;s features were chosen with this goal in mind, which is why we considered features like search, etc lower priority - the important thing for us was to help you find the actual document you were looking for and then do work on the *original* document, not to be a reading environment for other people&#8217;s content.</p>
<p>This difference will become much clearer over time as we integrate buzzword documents and the like directly into our interface, so that we can have integrated view/edit/comment workflows directly within a single acrobat.com interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
